How to sell GEO to your SEO clients: the offer, the pitch and the first 90 days
A practical playbook for adding generative engine optimization to an SEO agency: who to pitch first, how to open with evidence, what to include, objections and a 90-day plan.
On this page
The easiest GEO client to win is one you already have. They trust your SEO work, they've started asking about ChatGPT, and you already know their market. The pitch that works isn't a deck about the future of search — it's a page of evidence about their own visibility, compared with their competitors, and a clear plan for what you'll do about it each month.
Start with existing SEO clients
New-business GEO pitches are hard: the prospect has to believe in the channel and in you. Existing clients only have to see the gap. Sort your roster by:
- Clients who've asked about ChatGPT, AI Overviews or "AI search". They're already sold on the question.
- Clients in categories where buyers ask for recommendations — "best X for Y", local services, B2B software, considered purchases.
- Clients with an obvious competitor they care about beating.
Start with three. You'll learn more from three real engagements than from a perfect service page.
Open with their numbers, not the trend
Before the conversation, run the client's real buyer questions through ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity — enough times to see a pattern, not one screenshot. Then bring one page:
- "We asked 20 questions your customers ask, every week for a month, on three AI assistants."
- "You were mentioned in 71 of 240 answers. Your main competitor in 96."
- "On commuter questions you're not mentioned at all; these three review sites keep getting cited instead."
That's the whole pitch. It's specific, it's about them, and it answers "why should I care?" without a single industry statistic. If you don't have a month of data yet, a free check gives you a first look — then propose tracking as step one.
What to put in the offer
Structure GEO as a ladder, so clients can say yes to the first rung:
| Stage | What the client gets | Why it sells |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline audit (one-off) | Prompt set, competitor list, first month of tracked answers, gap analysis, priorities | Low commitment; creates the evidence |
| Monitoring and reporting (monthly) | AI visibility report: mention rate, competitors, missing questions, sources, change | Makes progress visible; easy to bundle |
| Optimisation (monthly) | Content for missing questions, source and listing work, entity clean-up, technical access | Where the results come from |
Many agencies bundle monitoring and reporting into existing SEO retainers and sell optimisation as an add-on or a separate retainer. Pricing options are in how to price GEO services; the monthly work itself is in GEO deliverables and ROI.
The objections you'll hear
"Can you guarantee we'll be recommended?" No — and say so. AI answers vary, and nobody controls them. What you can promise is a measured rate on a fixed set of questions, work aimed at the causes of the gap, and an honest monthly report on whether it's moving.
"Isn't this just SEO?" Much of it overlaps — good pages, crawlability, authority. The differences are where you measure (answers, not rankings), which sources matter (review sites and lists cited by the engines), and how you report (rates over many answers). See GEO vs SEO vs AEO.
"How will we know it's working?" The same questions, tracked weekly, compared month to month — with the answers available to read. Plus AI referral traffic in analytics where engines pass it.
"Our customers don't use ChatGPT." Maybe. The baseline will show whether competitors are being recommended to the ones who do.
"Why do they recommend our competitor?" Usually for concrete reasons you can find in the answers and their sources — see why ChatGPT recommends a competitor.
The first 90 days
- Days 1–14: agree 20 buyer questions and 3–5 competitors. Start weekly tracking on ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity. Check crawler access.
- Days 15–30: first report. Gap prompts, cited sources, entity check. Pick three priorities.
- Days 31–60: do the work: one or two pages that answer missing questions, outreach to two cited sources, clean up inconsistent descriptions.
- Days 61–90: second and third reports. Show what moved, what didn't, and why. Decide the ongoing scope with the client.
Ninety days gives enough tracked answers to separate change from noise, and enough work to show you're doing something. How often to track AI visibility explains why one month isn't enough to judge.
Make the reporting cheap, so the service is profitable
GEO margins disappear if someone spends a day per client typing prompts and building slides. That's the problem Ranxii solves for agencies: each client's prompts are asked on ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity every week, every answer is stored, and a report with your logo is ready each month. At €99 a month for 20 clients, the reporting rung of the ladder costs about €5 per client — the rest of the fee pays for your expertise.
Check a client’s AI visibility in about a minute
Enter a client’s website. Ranxii suggests buyer questions, asks a few of them on Perplexity and shows who gets mentioned — the client, a competitor, or nobody. No sign-up.
Keep reading
- How much to charge for GEO: pricing models for agenciesPublished price ranges for GEO audits, add-ons and retainers, the four pricing models agencies use, and how to build a price from hours and tooling so the service stays profitable.
- GEO deliverables and how to prove ROI to clientsWhat a GEO retainer should deliver each month and quarter, and an honest way to show results — from mention rate to AI referral traffic — without overclaiming.
- GEO vs SEO vs AEO: what's actually different for agenciesClear definitions of SEO, AEO and GEO, where they overlap, where they differ in tactics and measurement, and how to package them without confusing clients.